Lunes, Oktubre 15, 2012

Why (most) Editorial Cartoon Looks Nonsense


Most political cartoons try to be informative and entertaining, but fail at both. It's not that political humor can't be funny; it's just that these cartoonists are bad at it. Here's how:
-Labels: The reason of using labels is that they're either useless or necessary. Either a joke makes no sense without a label explaining what's going on, or the situation is so obvious that using labels is treating the readers as if their brains were made of dildos.
-Obviousness: When was the last time a political cartoon actually tried to make an insightful point? When was the last time they had anything original? Here's a great example: When the news was reporting on the building of a massive wall along the US-Mexico border, there were literally dozens of cartoons making the same joke: "WHAT IF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS COULD BE HIRED AS CHEAP LABOR TO BUILD THE WALL SO THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS COULDN'T ENTER THE US? IRONY."
When they're not making obvious jokes, they're making  incredibly simple observations that weren't funny to begin with and attempt to milk them for all they're worth.
-No knowledge required: Everyone is entitled to their opinion. However, when an issue requires extensive knowledge on a subject in order to actually understand and make assessments in regards to it, people who have no background in that particular area need to do everyone a favor and need not to speak. Political cartoonists however, can't grasp this concept, which probably why they're writing political cartoons and not doing something that requires intelligence, like ditch digging.
Yes, cartoonists care about factual accuracy about as much as Hitler cared about giving his employees the day off on Yom Kippur. The best example comes from anytime it snows, where a comic shows a sign on a building saying something to the extent of "global warming meeting canceled due to snow," because snow is proof that the climate hasn't changed at all and therefore the comic is ironic, meaning the comic is both funny and informative. With this accomplished, the cartoonist is so happy that any chance of him/her realizing how stupid this sounds vanishes.
-Exaggerations: There are no issues that are in black and white, the people involved in those issues vary greatly in their beliefs, and there is no simple way to summarize an issue in a few words.  At this point, you might think we're being unfair and (ironically) exaggerating the flaws of political cartoonists. We assure you, we're not.

Walang komento:

Mag-post ng isang Komento